On Thursday 14 July 2005 00:08, Andrew Thompson wrote: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 10:26:16AM +0300, Niki Denev wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > So, i have a proposition to add some informative printfs to if_bridge > > code, because returning "Invalid argument" is not so self explanatory, > > especially in the wrong MTU case. I think that most of the returns in > > bridge_ioctl_add(), could benefit from additional printf with more > > information. > > What do you think? > > Ive added a message for the incorrect MTU case and also relaxed the > requirements a little. The bridge will take the MTU of the first member > interface rather than being hardcoded at 1500, all members are still > required to have the exact same MTU. > > > cheers, > > Andrew Thanks! --nikiReceived on Thu Jul 14 2005 - 13:37:07 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:38 UTC