On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 09:18:44AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > *DRIVER* concept, not a hardware one in this context). The problem > with REV C and earlier is that their performance sucks because the DMA > engine used in the cards was LAME. Realtec fixed this in newer > revisions of the chip, and the re driver is able to take advantage of > that (as well as support the newer gige chips). The problem is that it is on-board embedded chip I try to use. Looks like I need to buy some external card like "Intel PRO/100+ PCI" and turn this one off... The question remains: why rl(4) driver pretend to be mpsafenet itself? Other drivers with problems, like de(4), are GIANT-locked by default. -- http://ache.pp.ru/Received on Thu Jul 21 2005 - 13:30:06 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:39 UTC