Re: libcipher replacement

From: Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH <allbery_at_ece.cmu.edu>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 23:34:44 -0400
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 20:32 -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 05:04:34PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > I have snet this mail 3 times and each time it never appeared on the list 
> > (that I saw.. I think it got eaten by a spam filtrer somewhere..)
> > 
> > trying again.
> > 
> > Since setkey(3) has now gone away so thoroughly that there is not even
> > a manual page saying how to replace it,
> > I need to port some code that uses it..
> > 
> > What is the suggested replacement?
> > 
> > Of course it is still on linux.. apparently in libcrypt.
> > but that doesn't help me keep this code on BSD..
> > 
> 
> I've seen each of your previous post.  Perhaps, you need
> to adjust your local mail filtering.

Likewise.

As to answers, I strongly suspect the openssl in base is the approved
replacement.

-- 
brandon s. allbery   [linux,solaris,freebsd,perl]      allbery_at_kf8nh.com
system administrator      [WAY too many hats]        allbery_at_ece.cmu.edu
electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon univ.         KF8NH
Received on Sat Jul 23 2005 - 01:34:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:39 UTC