Pawel Jakub Dawidek ha scritto: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 10:06:58PM +0200, Dario Freni wrote: > +> Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > +> > What's wrong with glabel(8)? > +> > +> Honestly, I didn't know it before. Looking into NanoBSD code I saw it > +> use GEOM_VOL, so I started investigate on geom_vol_ffs and write this > +> tiny class. Agreeing with Andreas Kohn on current_at_: > +> > +> <quote> > +> But, the really important question is: why is there geom_vol_ffs and > +> geom_label? Apparently I wasn't the only one who did not see > +> geom_label :) > +> </quote> > > That's actually my fault. I wanted to remove geom_vol_ffs long time > ago to not confuse the users. > > To not make your work useless, could you verify iso9660 part of > geom_label? Maybe I missed something there. I'm not so expert on this topic, but i stole part of my code from /sys/isofs/cd9660/cd9660_vfsops.c. I used the iso.h which has some useful structs to handle primary/sierra/supplementary descriptors. glabel is definitely ok for me, but please put that warning on geom_vol_ffs :) Anyway, I had fun with geom. Bye and thanks, Dario -- Dario Freni (saturnero_at_freesbie.org) FreeSBIE developer (http://www.freesbie.org) GPG Public key at http://www.saturnero.net/saturnero.asc
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:39 UTC