Martin Blapp wrote: > > Hi, > >> Are there plans to fix the gaping functionality holes in dhclient, or >> can we get the isc client back? > > > Please remember that the ISC version was a heavily modified version (done > by me) which polled the interface status. It worked rather good, but had > some issues (which are negligable if you compare it with the current mess) > > The startup issue is really a problem, so IMHO it is wrong to use one > dhcp-client per interface. This makes it also more difficult to maintain > more than one interface with dhcp. Actually I consider having one dhclient per interface the most important difference between the new code and the old code. The amount of code required support a single dhclient for the entire system was very painful and led to subtle bugs. > > I propose to make a knob into the rc.conf to make it possible > to use the old isc dhclient, because there is also a port > of it available. Of course devd etc needs to handle this too. > > Any suggestions ? I'm fine with this; in fact we discussed it early on. SamReceived on Wed Jul 27 2005 - 23:10:30 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:39 UTC