On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 12:56:02AM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote: > On Wed, July 27, 2005 7:44 pm, Brooks Davis said: > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 01:42:14AM +0200, Martin Blapp wrote: > > > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> > >>> If we can't get things under control soon, we can look at alternate > >>> options. IMO, using the port isn't really an option because it > >>> wouldn't allow users to install, but worst case reviving your version > >>> of the ISC code for 6.x might be feasiable. I'd really like to avoid > >>> that route though. > >> > >> Hmm, I don't know whats the best thing to do currently. But I think the > >> option to use the old version after installing would make all users > >> having problems happy (until they install a new box ;) > > > > Feel free to work up a patch. I'd much rather spend my time trying to > > solve the problems with the new code for the moment. > > Why not work on the issues with the OpenBSD version of dhclient for now, > if no solutions are found to the current problems before release of 6.0, > then revert to ISC version for release, and keep the obsd version in > current? That's my plan. I think we'll be able to fix the OpenBSD client sufficently for 6.0, but should we fail, falling back to the ISC client for RELNG_6 is the most rational thing to do. -- Brooks -- Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:39 UTC