On 2005-07-31 18:39, Garrett Wollman <wollman_at_csail.mit.edu> wrote: ><<On Sun, 31 Jul 2005 23:18:58 +0300, Giorgos Keramidas <keramida_at_FreeBSD.ORG> said: >> The bug seems to be elsewhere, namely to the fact that the filesystem >> code never realizes the file has changed size after I use mmap() to map >> a region beyond its current size and write past its current end. > > You should not expect it to do that. If you want to extend a file, > use ftruncate() before mapping it. Anything written past the end of a > file should be discarded on last close. I see. Thank you for the explanation :) It seems strange though that when the test program runs and finishes, munmapping the region and closing the file the data is still visible. Perhaps the fact that I used MAP_SHARED plays a role in that? Is the fact that the data written to the mapped region visible after the close (by mapping the same region) expected too? - GiorgosReceived on Sun Jul 31 2005 - 20:46:08 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:40 UTC