On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <20050601083308.D69811_at_lexi.siliconlandmark.com>, Andre Guibert de B > ruet writes: > Don Lewis wrote: >>> This problem is a bit complicated because there can be various >>> combinations of: >>> >>> mounted file systems that reside on swap-backed memory disks >>> >>> mounted file systems that reside on vnode-backed memory disks >>> >>> vnode-backed memory disks used as swap devices > > Maybe the simplest solution is also the best: keep track of the > dependencies and do the cleanup leaf->root on the resulting tree. > > It would not take much more than a simple data structure to let > the various pieces of code (mainly md(4) really) say "this device > depends on this other thing". PHK, How would you suggest implementing this? A TAILQ in global scope and a new struct? Did you get a chance to look at the patch? Do you have additional comments on it? Thanks, Andy /* Andre Guibert de Bruet * 6f43 6564 7020 656f 2e74 4220 7469 6a20 */ /* Code poet / Sysadmin * 636f 656b 2e79 5320 7379 6461 696d 2e6e */ /* GSM: +1 734 846 8758 * 5520 494e 2058 6c73 7565 6874 002e 0000 */ /* WWW: siliconlandmark.com * Tormenting bytes since 1980. */Received on Wed Jun 01 2005 - 11:07:33 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:35 UTC