Re: problem with boot0cfg on a twe?

From: Rainer Duffner <rainer_at_ultra-secure.de>
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 15:57:21 +0200
Randy Bush wrote:

>>>very -current
>>>
>>># boot0cfg -B -d 1 -s 1 -v twed0
>>>boot0cfg: write_mbr: /dev/twed0: No such file or directory
>>>
>>># boot0cfg -B -d 1 -s 1 -v twe0 
>>>boot0cfg: read /dev/twe0: Operation not supported by device
>>>
>>># ls -l /dev/twed0
>>>crw-r-----  1 root  operator    0,  76 Jun  8 23:32 /dev/twed0
>>>
>>># df
>>>Filesystem    1024-blocks      Used     Avail Capacity  Mounted on
>>>/dev/twed0s1a      253678     67506    165878    29%    /
>>>devfs                   1         1         0   100%    /dev
>>>/dev/twed0s1d      126702      7682    108884     7%    /var
>>>/dev/twed0s1e      126702       192    116374     0%    /var/spool
>>>/dev/twed0s1f    28341292   2393116  23680874     9%    /usr
>>>/dev/twed0s1g     4058062        54   3733364     0%    /usr/home
>>>/dev/twed0s1h       63256       858     57338     1%    /root
>>>/dev/twed1s1e   961291472 536501578 347886578    61%    /data
>>>procfs                  4         4         0   100%    /proc
>>>/dev/md0           126702        14    116552     0%    /tmp
>>>
>>>and the current man page for boot0cfg implies that i can install
>>>  boot0    - crt only
>>>  boot0sio - sio only
>>>
>>>i have many systems with /boot.config having -P that seem to be
>>>willing to go either way.  what am i not understanding?
>>>      
>>>
>>I think the problem is that you can't write onto the disk when you have 
>>it in use (for 5.4 at least). It just gives the wrong error-message.
>>I had the same problem - booting from CD usually lets you apply boot0cfg.
>>    
>>
>
>not very useful for remote admin.  why should i not be able to write it?
>
>  
>
>>But my real problem is that I can only boot the PC from the SuSE 9.2 CD 
>>! (2*120GB as RAID1). When I boot from the array, I get a kind of 
>>endless loop of pre-boot panic or just an endless beep at the F1-promt, 
>>depending if I have booteasy or not.
>>
>>When I boot from the SuSE9.2 CD, it will recognize that I have a Unix-OS 
>>already installed and boot from HD as default.
>>That always works.
>>I have 3 identical PCs with this problem.
>>    
>>
>
>yechh!
>
>i can boot this sucker.  though i have to manually go through
>
>    FreeBSD/i386 boot
>    Default: 0:ad(1,a)kernel
>    boot: 1:ad(1,a)/boot/loader
>
>which is what i want to fix
>
>randy
>


I looked in my archives (well, it's actually at gmane):

I got this from Doug White:

> This is a erroneous message. The actual problem is:
> >
> >    484 boot0cfg NAMI  "/dev/twed0"
> >    484 boot0cfg RET   open -1 errno 1 Operation not permitted
> >
> > This is a known problem with certain MBR layouts. To work around this
> > problem, set:
> >
> > sysctl kern.geom.debugflags=16
> > then try your boot0cfg. There's a protection mechanism that sometimes gets
> > confused by certain partition table layouts. Flag 16 disables that
> > protection.  I don't recommend running this unless you are explicitly
> > trying to updating something in a partition table-like area; its very easy
> > to destroy your system with the flag set!



Can you try this?


cheers,
Rainer
Received on Thu Jun 09 2005 - 11:57:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:36 UTC