Christian Brueffer <chris_at_unixpages.org> writes: > NetBSD has both pam.conf(5) and pam(8) that fit with OpenPAM FreeBSD > uses (NetBSD recently imported OpenPAM as well). I'll import these > in the next couple of days. Allow me to raise a few objections. First, the reason why we don't have a pam(8) is that we have a rather comprehensive article about PAM in the doc tree, and I couldn't make up my mind about how much of it to include in pam(8) and how much to leave out. My feeling now is that pam(8) should probably just reference the article and provide a quick overview of our PAM modules (with references to their individual man pages). The reason why we don't have a pam.conf(5) is slightly more complex. Part of it is that the information that belongs there is already present in different places in different forms (/etc/pam.d/README for instance). Another part is that it is *hard* to describe the meanings of the control flags both accurately and succintly. NetBSD didn't get it quite right. In addition, their man page is under a four-clause BSD license, which makes me leery of including it in OpenPAM. My own attempt is in Perforce: http://perforce.freebsd.org/fileViewer.cgi?FSPC=//depot/projects/openpam/doc/man/pam.conf.5&REV=2 DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des_at_des.noReceived on Thu Jun 09 2005 - 15:07:36 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:36 UTC