On 06/09/05 13:51, Kevin Oberman wrote: >>Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 13:06:27 -0500 >>From: Jonathan Noack <noackjr_at_alumni.rice.edu> >>Sender: owner-freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org >> >>On 06/09/05 09:02, Randy Bush wrote: >>>>I looked in my archives (well, it's actually at gmane): >>>> >>>>I got this from Doug White: >>>> >>>>>This is a erroneous message. The actual problem is: >>>>> >>>>>> 484 boot0cfg NAMI "/dev/twed0" >>>>>> 484 boot0cfg RET open -1 errno 1 Operation not permitted >>>>>> >>>>>>This is a known problem with certain MBR layouts. To work around this >>>>>>problem, set: >>>>>> >>>>>>sysctl kern.geom.debugflags=16 >>>>>>then try your boot0cfg. There's a protection mechanism that sometimes gets >>>>>>confused by certain partition table layouts. Flag 16 disables that >>>>>>protection. I don't recommend running this unless you are explicitly >>>>>>trying to updating something in a partition table-like area; its very easy >>>>>>to destroy your system with the flag set! >>>> >>>>Can you try this? >>> >>>bingo!!! >>> >>> # sysctl kern.geom.debugflags=16 >>> kern.geom.debugflags: 0 -> 16 >>> # boot0cfg -B -d 1 -s 1 -v twed0 >>> # flag start chs type end chs offset size >>> 1 0x80 0: 1: 1 0xa5 1023:254:63 63 72292437 >>> >>> version=1.0 drive=0x1 mask=0xf ticks=182 >>> options=packet,update,nosetdrv >>> default_selection=F1 (Slice 1) >> >> From what I gather from Poul-Henning Kamp's posts on the matter, this >>is a design feature and not a bug. If a disk is mounted in any way >>(including read-only), you may not update the MBR to prevent foot >>shooting. The real problem is that the error that is returned gives >>little information. There has not been a consensus on how to make >>things easier for the user. Various ways to print friendly error >>messages have been proposed and shot down. >> >>This issue is documented in boot0cfg(8) as the first entry in the BUGS >>section: >>"Protection mechanisms in the geom(4) subsystem might prevent boot0cfg >>from being able to update the MBR on a mounted disk. Instructions for >>temporarily disabling these protection mechanisms can be found in the >>geom(4) manpage." >> >>Under the DIAGNOSTICS section of geom(4) describing the use of the >>kern.geom.debugflags sysctl: >>"0x10 (allow foot shooting) >>Allow writing to Rank 1 providers. This would, for example, allow the >>super-user to overwrite the MBR on the root disk or write random sectors >>elsewhere to a mounted disk. The implications are obvious." >> >>I'm not sure what "tracing" is so I don't understand why 0x02 and 0x04 >>are necessary (to give us 0x16). > > I think you forgot which bases the numbers are in. 16base10 is the same > thing as 0x10. No other flags are involved. Or 16(10) = 10(16). *blush* I never considered they would be listed with different bases, although that makes perfect sense. Thanks! -- Jonathan Noack | noackjr_at_alumni.rice.edu | OpenPGP: 0x991D8195
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:36 UTC