Re: pam.conf(5) and pam(8)

From: Christian Brueffer <chris_at_unixpages.org>
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 21:28:50 +0200
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 09:22:31PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Christian Brueffer <chris_at_unixpages.org> writes:
> > On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 07:07:27PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> > > My feeling now is that pam(8) should probably just reference the
> > > article and provide a quick overview of our PAM modules (with
> > > references to their individual man pages).
> > That's what the NetBSD manpage mostly does.  Short description of
> > the functionality and the account, auth, password and session
> > facilities.
> 
> Please re-read what I wrote.
> 

I know what you wrote, but it doesn't mean we can't fix the stuff
appropriately (or just link to the PAM article).

Leaving the licensing problem alone for now.

- Christian

-- 
Christian Brueffer	chris_at_unixpages.org	brueffer_at_FreeBSD.org
GPG Key:	 http://people.freebsd.org/~brueffer/brueffer.key.asc
GPG Fingerprint: A5C8 2099 19FF AACA F41B  B29B 6C76 178C A0ED 982D

Received on Thu Jun 09 2005 - 17:28:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:36 UTC