On Sun, 12 Jun 2005 14:42:27 -0500 linimon_at_lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) wrote: > On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 03:44:03PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > I intend to write everything up over the next week and give it to some > > of our docs people for SGML review (if nobody volunteers I pick someone > > out of the blue and ask nicely for a review :-) ). > > I wonder if such a list, being fairly subject to change, might not be > better suired to a wiki rather than being committed to SGML? Technical reasons: If someone implements an entry from the list, it's not much work to commit the removal of the entry from the list. And since we don't want to have an endless list, the number of additions should be limited. Since a commit requires a commit log, the removal of a non-sense entry also comes with a reason (at least it should). At least the last part looks like a VCS is well suited for the job. Visual reasons: You can use the power of SQML to render structured data, while in a wiki you have to do everything on your own (with the typical cut&paste errors and inconsistencies). Do you have any strong reasons which make the wiki a better choice? Bye, Alexander. -- 0 and 1. Now what could be so hard about that? http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander _at_ Leidinger.net GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7Received on Sun Jun 12 2005 - 20:46:52 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:36 UTC