Robert Watson <rwatson_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > Looks like what basically happened is this these kern_malloc.c > changes increase the memory burden on UMA as statistics structures > for malloc types now get allocated from UMA. It looks like, from > your dmesg, you have a fair number of modules loaded, so the storage > for the statistics comes out of the early UMA page pool, whereas > before it came out of BSS. We'll see if further tuning is required or > not with large numbers of modules. I try to load as much as possible as modules. Can you quantify "large number of modules"? I could load some more modules for testing purposes at the weekend. Bye, Alexander. -- http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander _at_ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild _at_ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137 "Why is it that we rejoice at a birth and grieve at a funeral? It is because we are not the person involved" -- Mark TwainReceived on Fri Jun 17 2005 - 07:37:49 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:36 UTC