On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 19:46 -0400, Martin Cracauer wrote: > Hmmmmm, this doesn't look quite right. I am probably missing the > debug info from within the radeon module. But since I don't have the > base address for the module I'm not sure how to add its symbols when > debugging the vmcore. > > Let me know how useful this is. > > Martin > > (kgdb) bt > #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:165 > #1 0xc052db30 in boot (howto=260) at ../../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:397 > #2 0xc052ddf4 in panic (fmt=0xc06caa94 "from debugger") > at ../../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:553 > #3 0xc0450711 in db_panic (addr=-1066780860, have_addr=0, count=-1, > modif=0xf5a3d770 "") at ../../../ddb/db_command.c:435 > #4 0xc04506a8 in db_command (last_cmdp=0xc0737444, cmd_table=0x0, > aux_cmd_tablep=0xc06fcdf4, aux_cmd_tablep_end=0xc06fcdf8) > at ../../../ddb/db_command.c:349 > #5 0xc0450770 in db_command_loop () at ../../../ddb/db_command.c:455 > #6 0xc0452305 in db_trap (type=12, code=0) at ../../../ddb/db_main.c:221 > #7 0xc05462df in kdb_trap (type=12, code=0, tf=0xf5a3d904) > at ../../../kern/subr_kdb.c:471 > #8 0xc06a5bcb in trap_fatal (frame=0xf5a3d904, eva=3221094400) > at ../../../i386/i386/trap.c:826 > #9 0xc06a593f in trap_pfault (frame=0xf5a3d904, usermode=0, eva=3221094400) > at ../../../i386/i386/trap.c:749 > #10 0xc06a5561 in trap (frame= > {tf_fs = -1067122680, tf_es = -1056702424, tf_ds = 40, tf_edi = 256, tf_esi = -533393408, tf_ebp = -173811368, tf_isp = -173811408, tf_ebx = 130740224, tf_edx = 1015808, tf_ecx = -134217728, tf_eax = -533393149, tf_trapno = 12, tf_err = 2, tf_eip = -1066780860, tf_cs = 32, tf_eflags = 590470, tf_esp = 0, tf_ss = -137695232}) at ../../../i386/i386/trap.c:439 > ---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit--- > #11 0xc069538a in calltrap () at ../../../i386/i386/exception.s:139 > #12 0xc0650008 in ufs_setattr (ap=0x0) at ../../../ufs/ufs/ufs_vnops.c:564 > #13 0xc069fe39 in nexus_activate_resource (bus=0xc2703d00, child=0xc2821000, > type=3, rid=16, r=0xc281dd80) at ../../../i386/i386/nexus.c:419 > #14 0xc05436b0 in bus_generic_activate_resource (dev=0x0, child=0xc2821000, > type=3, rid=16, r=0xc281dd80) at bus_if.h:290 > #15 0xc05436b0 in bus_generic_activate_resource (dev=0x0, child=0xc2821000, > type=3, rid=16, r=0xc281dd80) at bus_if.h:290 > #16 0xc05436b0 in bus_generic_activate_resource (dev=0x0, child=0xc2821000, > type=3, rid=16, r=0xc281dd80) at bus_if.h:290 > #17 0xc05436b0 in bus_generic_activate_resource (dev=0x0, child=0xc2821000, > type=3, rid=16, r=0xc281dd80) at bus_if.h:290 > #18 0xc05436b0 in bus_generic_activate_resource (dev=0x0, child=0xc2821000, > type=3, rid=16, r=0xc281dd80) at bus_if.h:290 > #19 0xc04addaa in pci_alloc_resource (dev=0xc2821080, child=0xc2821000, > type=3, rid=0xf5a3db2c, start=0, end=4294967295, count=1, flags=6) > at ../../../dev/pci/pci.c:1753 > #20 0xc0543a88 in bus_alloc_resource (dev=0x0, type=3, rid=0xf5a3db2c, > start=0, end=4294967295, count=1, flags=6) at bus_if.h:262 > #21 0xc2b9a273 in ?? () Assuming that those ??s are in the radeon module, this is a new backtrace to me. There's been one happening to some people where pmap_mapdev fails to allocate enough memory, which results in a panic, but I haven't been able to reproduce it here. My systems are working just fine on fresh -current :( -- Eric Anholt eta_at_lclark.edu http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ anholt_at_FreeBSD.orgReceived on Fri Jun 17 2005 - 23:24:34 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:37 UTC