Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Tarc <tarc_at_tarc.po.cs.msu.su> writes: > >>On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 08:17:10PM +0200, Dag-Erling SmЬrgrav wrote: >> >>>Bad hardware - most likely bad RAM, possibly a bad CPU. >> >>Hmm... I thinked about this, but RAM is ok. Side note, I could not have a look at your config/dmesg etc. tarc.po.cs.msu.su could not be found. > How do you know? Most software memory testers don't load the system > enough to trip over marginal RAM; 'make buildworld' does. Yeah, buildkernel and buildworld are good stress tests. The same as a gcc bootstrap is. >>How test processor? > > > 'make buildworld' with known-good RAM is a pretty good indicator. Here my side note 2, it's not on x86, but on ppc. I have a powerbook with one GB of ram. Doing buildworld and buildkernel ended up in such sig 11 failures at random places. Not reproducable. I know my hw is ok, I do daily gcc bootstraps and the machine works. But under fbsd ppc I got the above sig 11 issues. A short talk with Peter Grehan made me try to reduce the physical memory software side with hw.physmem=512M. Bingo, that was it. I could do buildkernel and buildworld with hw.physmem=512M. No problem. So, our thinking is, that there is a trouble with physical mem > 512/640MB on fbsd ppc. This note may not help in your case since it is on ppc fbsd. But maybe it gives you another idea? Regards, AndreasReceived on Sun Jun 19 2005 - 18:40:20 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:37 UTC