Re: Summary: experiences with NanoBSD, successes and nits on a Soekris 4801

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk_at_phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:58:13 +0200
In message <20050620173016.GB93634_at_dragon.NUXI.org>, "David O'Brien" writes:
>On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 09:58:46AM +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
>> - Try to figure out how to better differentiate build vs. install time
>>   frobbing.  For example, the NanoBSD NO_CXX concern: we want C++
>>   applications, we just don't want to install the build chain.
>>   Currently, we have no way to differentiate these concepts, since our
>>   dependencies are entirely build-time, and our frobs have to match up
>>   (generally)  between build and install.  I.e., devd is built only if
>>   !NO_CXX, which is a build-time concern.
>
>Is NanoBSD split into a build and install phase like
>buildworld/installworld?  If so, can you try the equivalent of
>'make buildworld && make -DNO_CXX installworld'?

nanobsd basically calls buildworld and installworld, so that
would be possible, provided the options work out that way.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk_at_FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Mon Jun 20 2005 - 15:58:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:37 UTC