On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 08:29:19PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote: > On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Daniel Eischen wrote: > I'm trying to remember the reason NO_CXX actually exists -- I believe it's > because our sparc64 port didn't have working C++ for some period of time, > so we didn't build C++ (and its dependencies). I created it in March 2000 to make GCC hacking and the process of upgrading easier for the GCC importer. > It could well be that NO_CXX is OBE, and we can eliminate it entirely? > I.e., C++ support libraries and applications are now a basic > requirement as DHCP is broken without them? It wasn't really designed as a nob for most people to set. Its use by NanoBSD is probably a misuse of it. There should be a NO_TOOLCHAIN or NO_TOOLCHAIN_CXX knob for what NO_CXX is probably being used for. -- -- David (obrien_at_FreeBSD.org)Received on Tue Jun 21 2005 - 02:45:12 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:37 UTC