Re: New dhclient - supposed to 'down'/'delete'?

From: <gnn_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:36:39 +0900

At Thu, 23 Jun 2005 08:02:45 -0500,
Eric Anderson wrote:
> How about only down/delete other disconnected interfaces when a 
> currently disconnected interface comes online?
> 

That is certainly one thought I have had.  I want to sit down and
think about this, possibly this weekend.  I would prefer to avoid a
random change ;-)

Later,
George

Received on Fri Jun 24 2005 - 03:48:12 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Andrey Chernov: "panic: Memory modified after free"
Previous message: Martin Cracauer: "Re: Driver that works only when module is loaded late, not from loader.conf"
In reply to: Eric Anderson: "Re: New dhclient - supposed to 'down'/'delete'?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:37 UTC