Re: new panics

From: Mike Silbersack <silby_at_silby.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 15:56:11 -0500 (CDT)
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005, Thierry Herbelot wrote:

> I did not get the panic within minutes of testing (I ususually first sync the
> sources from a local CVS mirror, then build the tree). The panic occurred
> during the "buildworld" phase.
>
> 	TfH

That makes some sense, because we may not be getting around to the 
modified memory until we hit some heavy memory usage.  Also, one backtrace 
showed the panic happening when uma_reclaim was called from the vm pageout 
daemon.  Sounds like I should throw something in to (optionally) call 
uma_reclaim on a regular basis so that we might catch this more quickly.

Mike "Silby" Silbersack
Received on Fri Jun 24 2005 - 18:56:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:37 UTC