Le Sunday 26 June 2005 08:43, Andrey Chernov a écrit : > On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 01:20:47AM -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote: > > Yes and no. Your results tell me that it's probably not a simple use > > after free, but rather something smashing all over memory for some > > reason. > > It sounds nasty, but I observe no strange behaviour of TCP connections at > all for a long time. I have a lots of them actively running sshd, > sendmail, popper, ftpd, bind, httpd and cvsupd servers. still no good luck : after using the second patch, no panic, but the debug messages seem incomplete : (last freed by: /0/) This memory last freed by: 0 Memory modified after free 0xc15d5800(256) val=800 _at_ 0xc15d583c This memory last freed by: 0 Memory modified after free 0xc15d5800(256) val=0 _at_ 0xc15d5840 This memory last freed by: 0 Memory modified after free 0xc15d5800(256) val=3 _at_ 0xc15d5844 the test case is : building the kernel while tar-ing the src tree over two separate ssh session. TfH PS : what is puzzling is that I've got another machine running a more recent -current, with no ill effects (but it uses an ed(4) I/F)Received on Sun Jun 26 2005 - 06:50:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:37 UTC