Re: OpenPAM Figwort broke PAM modules from ports

From: Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie_at_le-hen.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 13:49:51 +0200
Hi Robert,

> Could you propose specific text to add to UPDATING, and I'll drop it in? 
> Perhaps something along the lines of the following:
> 
> 	Some previous versions of PAM have permitted the use of
> 	non-absolute paths in /etc/pam.conf or /etc/pam.d/* when referring
> 	to third party PAM modules in /usr/local/lib.  A change has been
> 	made to require the use of absolute paths in order to avoid
> 	ambiguity and dependence on library path configuration, which may
> 	affect existing configurations.

This is perfect.  Thank you very much.

Best regards,
-- 
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
Received on Wed Jun 29 2005 - 09:49:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:37 UTC