On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, Dariusz Kulinski wrote: > Hello Doug, > > Tuesday, March 1, 2005, 10:50:19 AM, you wrote: > > >> > Looks like it ran over a spammed thread, but I'll want to see the fault > >> > address. Bets on whether its 0xdeadc0de+offset? > >> 0xdeadc0de, huh? :) > > free()d memory regions get filled with 0xdeadc0de to hunt down > > use-after-free conditions. > > Ok, I thought it was one of developer jokes =) > > > Thats what I want :-) > > > OK, it wasn't deadc0de, so can you load the crashdump up, go down to the > > sigtd() frame, and "print *td"? It'll be a huge spew. > > (kgdb) frame 20 > #20 0xc04e9d3f in sigtd (p=0xc16948d4, sig=14, prop=129) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_sig.c:1581 > 1581 if (td->td_waitset != NULL && > (kgdb) print *td > $1 = {td_proc = 0xc16948d4, td_ksegrp = 0xc26b9310, td_plist = {tqe_next = 0xc1b48190, tqe_prev = 0xc1b95198}, td_kglist = { > tqe_next = 0x0, tqe_prev = 0xc26b931c}, td_slpq = {tqe_next = 0x0, tqe_prev = 0xc1794b80}, td_lockq = {tqe_next = 0x0, > tqe_prev = 0x0}, td_runq = {tqe_next = 0x0, tqe_prev = 0xc26b9324}, td_selq = {tqh_first = 0x0, tqh_last = 0xc17c31c0}, > td_sleepqueue = 0x0, td_turnstile = 0xc15d5dc0, td_tid = 100081, td_flags = 8, td_inhibitors = 6, td_pflags = 8, > td_dupfd = 0, td_wchan = 0xd12bfc20, td_wmesg = 0xc06cef0b "sigwait", td_lastcpu = 0 '\0', td_oncpu = 255 'ÿ', > td_locks = 0, td_blocked = 0x0, td_ithd = 0x0, td_lockname = 0x0, td_contested = {lh_first = 0x0}, td_sleeplocks = 0x0, > td_intr_nesting_level = 0, td_pinned = 0, td_mailbox = 0x9903010, td_ucred = 0xc2b41b00, td_standin = 0x0, td_prticks = 0, > td_upcall = 0xc17c0510, td_sticks = 2210, td_uuticks = 0, td_usticks = 0, td_intrval = 0, td_oldsigmask = {__bits = {0, 0, > 0, 0}}, td_sigmask = {__bits = {159751, 0, 0, 0}}, td_siglist = {__bits = {0, 0, 0, 0}}, td_waitset = 0xd12bfc64, > td_umtx = {tqe_next = 0x0, tqe_prev = 0x0}, td_generation = 376536, td_sigstk = {ss_sp = 0x0, ss_size = 0, ss_flags = 0}, > td_kflags = 0, td_xsig = 0, td_profil_addr = 0, td_profil_ticks = 0, td_base_pri = 104 'h', td_priority = 104 'h', > td_pcb = 0xd12bfda0, td_state = TDS_INHIBITED, td_retval = {0, 137620480}, td_slpcallout = {c_links = {sle = { > sle_next = 0x0}, tqe = {tqe_next = 0x0, tqe_prev = 0xc1cd68e4}}, c_time = 216540257, c_arg = 0xc17c3190, c_func = 0, > c_flags = 8}, td_frame = 0xd12bfd48, td_kstack_obj = 0xc1796318, td_kstack = 3509313536, td_kstack_pages = 2, > td_altkstack_obj = 0x0, td_altkstack = 0, td_altkstack_pages = 0, td_critnest = 1, td_md = {md_savecrit = 582}, > td_sched = 0xc17c32e4} This is quite helpful, thanks! It appears the thread had called sigtimedwait() and the timeout fired. The clock ithread goes to whack the process with SIGALRM and checks if its waiting in sigtimedwait() specifically. That info is coded into the td_waitset member of struct thread, which get set from the user. All of the frontends provide the set from a stack variable. later, in kern_sigtimedwait()... 926 td->td_waitset = &waitset; 927 error = msleep(&ps, &p->p_mtx, PPAUSE|PCATCH, "sigwait", hz); So now a pointer to stack variable is in the thread. Later on sigtd() comes along and wants to dereference it and that stack page isn't available according to the VM system and that trips the panic. Some more exploration is necessary. Can you make the crashdump and debug kernel available? Also, what was running when this panic tripped? ("info threads" in kgdb may be useful.) -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite_at_gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.orgReceived on Wed Mar 02 2005 - 01:59:44 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:29 UTC