Frank Mayhar wrote: > Eric Anderson wrote: > >>Hmm - this was working this morning before I updated, with a -CURRENT as of last week, and I didn't notice anything in /usr/src/UPDATING. So what I should have is: >> >>ath_load="YES" >>ath_hal_load="YES" >>ath_rate_load="YES" > > > I just have > > if_ath_load="YES" > > in my /boot/loader.conf. That picks up everything. > > >>I guess what I missed (and just noticed), is that there are not individual modules for each rate algorithm now, one module (named ath_rate) that is the algorithm of whatever is built. > > > It has been this way for some time, actually. Ok - I missed it, thanks for the info. >>>You want to go to sys/modules/ath_rate_{amrr|onoe|sample} and do a 'make >>>install'. >> >>I did that already - but why doesn't a 'make installkernel ...' not accomplish that? (forgive my ignorance) > > > It does. It installs ath_rate.ko for each of amrr, onoe and (now) sample. > Obviously, the last one in wins. You'll have to ask Sam about what shortcoming > of the FreeBSD module system leads to this. Hmm.. Ok - thanks >>>Hmm. Is ath_rate_sample linked properly? >> >>How can I help you determine that? (is readelf -a output what you want?) > > > Already fixed; read your -current email. Done and patched - works like a champ now. Well, kind of.. Eric -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Anderson Sr. Systems Administrator Centaur Technology I have seen the future and it is just like the present, only longer. ------------------------------------------------------------------------Received on Fri Mar 11 2005 - 17:53:38 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:29 UTC