Daniel Eriksson wrote: > Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > > >>just ffs: 1:47 min >>nullfs: 1:43 min (oops!:) >>nullfs in jail: 12:12 min > > > I've got ~350 nullfs mounts on one of my servers, and I've never noticed it > being slower than plain ffs. I'm not using it in a jail however, maybe > that's why I've never experienced any slowdown with nullfs. The same with my tests. Have you noticed? -- Sem.Received on Sun Mar 13 2005 - 17:54:20 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:29 UTC