Re: unionfs 5.4

From: Jeff Roberson <jroberson_at_chesapeake.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 09:00:37 -0500 (EST)
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:

> Peter Edwards wrote:
>
> > If someone experiencing these issues could try rebuilding after changing
> >
> > #define NNULLNODECACHE 16
> > to
> > #define NNULLNODECACHE 1024
> >
> > in null_subr.c (line 50 in my version, 1.45)
> >
> > And just see if it makes much of a difference. If so, it might be
>
> It does not help. The problem with nullfs only in jail environment.
> I've made a simple test: build devel/gettext port. Here is results:
>
> just ffs: 1:47 min
> nullfs:   1:43 min (oops!:)
> nullfs in jail: 12:12 min
>
> Almost ten times degradation.

Can you try this again on current?  I just committed some changes to
nullfs which vastly simplify the locking.  I don't see anything inherent
in the code that should cause such a slowdown.

>
> --
> Sem.
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"
>
Received on Tue Mar 15 2005 - 13:00:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:30 UTC