On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 10:11:04AM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: +> On 2005-01-06 23:58, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd_at_freebsd.org> wrote: +> > I like intmax_t also much better than int64_t, but I took it from +> > NetBSD and they got int64_t there. Anyway, I think we don't have to be +> > 100% compatible here and I'll look what can be done. +> +> Bearing this in mind, is it ok then if I commit the pstat changes shown +> below, which use intmax_t or is it better to change all the intmax_t +> instances in pstat.c to int64_t? Use int64_t. We decided not to use intmax_t in humanize_number(3), because then we need to include inttypes.h from libutil.h and this is just too nasty. The patch looks ok. -- Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheel.pl pjd_at_FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:30 UTC