On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 03:00:20PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 13:02 +0000, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 07:11:27AM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > > > On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 20:55 +0000, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > > > > The read-only XFS access was quite stable in my testing and managed to > > > > survive through multiple 'make -j12 buildworld' rounds with src/ stored > > > > on XFS partition, so I think it is a good time for a wider community to > > > > take it for a spin and start reporting bugs/panics that I overlooked. > > > > > > Unfortunately it does not build on my machine (AMD64): > > > > > <useless incomplete log skipped> > > > > Unfortunately you did not provide any information that can tell me > > what is going on on your machine. How are building XFS, as a kernel > > option or as a module, what is in your config file? > > The log is not that useless; because there is no -DKLD_MODULE flag, it > tells you that I'm trying to link XFS directly into the kernel... > Config is attached. > Well, a lot of flags were missing indeed, not only KLD_MODULE. As it turns out, you run the kernel stripped of each and any debugging support, without even INVARIANTS_SUPPORT. You also seem to have missed WERROR="" on make command line. Basically, you did everything what message in ~kan/xfs told you not to do ... and good thing you did :) I created a new snapshot file which should fix compilation on bare kernels like yours is. Keep in mind though that it is unlikely that I will be able to help you in case you stumble upon a panic in your config. -- Alexander KabaevReceived on Tue Mar 22 2005 - 15:33:37 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:30 UTC