On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 12:26:32AM -0500, Jeff Roberson wrote: > On Sun, 20 Mar 2005, Peter Holm wrote: > > > With GENERIC HEAD from Mar 18 15:56 UTC I ran into these two > > problems where a user process seems to be waiting on a lock, > > that appears to be owned by non-existent thread. Hey, your back! > > Odd that this is a directory. Do you know if the other times you were > able to trigger this were also with directories? > Yes, your right. Grepping throu the crash dumps it appears that the other getblk problems were related to read or write. - Peter > > > > 5123 [SLPQ getblk 0xc665717c][SLP] mkdir > > > > sleepq_switch(c665717c,cf4698c8,c061bcd5,...) at sleepq_switch+0xe0 > > sleepq_wait(c665717c,0,0,2010020,600) at sleepq_wait+0x30 > > msleep(c665717c,c09118dc,50,c083af8f,0) at msleep+0x311 > > acquire(cf469920,2010020,600,c1b2b000,0) at acquire+0xba > > debuglockmgr(c665717c,2090022,c1e7d5a0,...) at debuglockmgr+0x406 > > getblk(c1e7d500,0,0,800,0) at getblk+0x15a > > breadn(c1e7d500,0,0,800,0) at breadn+0x58 > > bread(c1e7d500,0,0,800,0) at bread+0x20 > > ffs_blkatoff(c1e7d500,0,0,0,cf469a58) at ffs_blkatoff+0x9e > > ufs_lookup(cf469b18) at ufs_lookup+0x326 > > VOP_CACHEDLOOKUP_APV(c08cf140,cf469b18) at VOP_CACHEDLOOKUP_APV+0x7e > > vfs_cache_lookup(cf469b9c) at vfs_cache_lookup+0xd2 > > VOP_LOOKUP_APV(c08cf140,cf469b9c) at VOP_LOOKUP_APV+0x7e > > lookup(cf469c7c,c0918d80,0,c1b2b000,69f) at lookup+0x362 > > namei(cf469c7c) at namei+0x34a > > kern_rmdir(c1b2b000,bfbc97d0,0,cf469d40,c07cc3a3) at kern_rmdir+0x3a > > rmdir(c1b2b000,cf469d14,1,25,292) at rmdir+0x12 > > syscall(2804002f,bfbf002f,bfb8002f,2804f24c,bfbfeb00) at syscall+0x213 > > > > (kgdb) p (*(struct lock *)0xc665717c)->lk_lockholder->td_state > > $2 = TDS_INACTIVE > > > > http://www.holm.cc/stress/log/cons122.html > > http://www.holm.cc/stress/log/cons123.html > > -- > > Peter Holm > >Received on Thu Mar 24 2005 - 07:14:37 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:30 UTC