In the last episode (Mar 24), Julian Elischer said: > John Baldwin wrote: > >On Mar 23, 2005, at 9:00 PM, Matthew N. Dodd wrote: > >>On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Julian Elischer wrote: > >>>eject should imply a detach.. > >>>i.e. I think your patch should call the detach code from the eject > >>>code. > >> > >>Eject is for devices that support removable media. > > that doesn't mean that an eject shouldn't do all teh work for a > detach as well. I would be extremely surprised if a "camcontrol eject cd0" removed /dev/cd0 :) Eject is for devices whose media can be removed, but the device itself stays. Or are you just saying detach should do an eject (possibly a stop also) first? -- Dan Nelson dnelson_at_allantgroup.comReceived on Thu Mar 24 2005 - 18:56:38 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:30 UTC