Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <42481C66.7090409_at_samsco.org>, Scott writes: > > >>So are you saying that an async notification mechanism needs to be >>invented for SCSI, or that all SCSI users should be required to use >>SES or SAFTE enclosures for all SCSI devices, or that we should be like >>Windows and constantly poll the devices? > > > I don't care _how_ we make CAM/SCSI behave like the users expect. > Well, I waved my hands at it for a few minutes, but nothing changed... hmm.... =-) My question to you was partially rhetorical, since a good solution just doesn't exist. Even the polling option isn't good because it will disrupt things like burning CD's; in Windows, the CD burning software packages that are out there go through an impressive set of hoops to deal with this polling problem. ScottReceived on Mon Mar 28 2005 - 14:30:33 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:30 UTC