On Tuesday 29 March 2005 01:52 pm, Dan Cojocar wrote: > On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 13:35:33 -0500, Jung-uk Kim <jkim_at_niksun.com> wrote: > > On Tuesday 29 March 2005 01:22 pm, Dan Cojocar wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > > > I noticed the following interrupt storm in my dmesg: > > > > > > Interrupt storm detected on "irq11: rl1"; throttling interrupt > > > source Interrupt storm detected on "irq5: rl0"; throttling > > > interrupt source > > > > > > Here is my vmstat -i: > > > interrupt total rate > > > irq0: clk 128600 199 > > > irq1: atkbd0 2499 3 > > > irq4: sio0 2 0 > > > irq5: rl0 128901 200 > > > irq8: rtc 82294 127 > > > irq11: rl1 128902 200 > > > irq12: psm0 16152 25 > > > irq14: ata0 12600 19 > > > irq15: ata1 71 0 > > > Total 500021 776 > > > > > > and here is my dmesg: > > > http://cs.ubbcluj.ro/~dan/dmesg.txt > > > > > > I have options DEVICE_POLLING and options HZ=200, i have tested > > > with greater HZ values like 1000, and without DEVICE_POLLING > > > but i have the same storm. > > > > Try this: > > > > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200503161154.04555.jkim > > > > Jung-uk Kim > > Thank you for your quick response. > I set debug.acpi.quirks=4 but i get the same result. :-( Some times nForce chipsets' broken IRQ routing is beyond repair. > Should i look for something specific. Do you have the latest BIOS? Jung-uk Kim > Thanks, > DanReceived on Tue Mar 29 2005 - 17:01:19 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:30 UTC