Re: Interrupt storm

From: Divacky Roman <xdivac02_at_stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 18:22:51 +0200
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 01:35:33PM -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 March 2005 01:22 pm, Dan Cojocar wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I noticed the following interrupt storm in my dmesg:
> >
> > Interrupt storm detected on "irq11: rl1"; throttling interrupt
> > source Interrupt storm detected on "irq5: rl0"; throttling
> > interrupt source
> >
> > Here is my vmstat -i:
> > interrupt                          total       rate
> > irq0: clk                         128600        199
> > irq1: atkbd0                        2499          3
> > irq4: sio0                             2          0
> > irq5: rl0                         128901        200
> > irq8: rtc                          82294        127
> > irq11: rl1                        128902        200
> > irq12: psm0                        16152         25
> > irq14: ata0                        12600         19
> > irq15: ata1                           71          0
> > Total                             500021        776
> >
> > and here is my dmesg:
> > http://cs.ubbcluj.ro/~dan/dmesg.txt
> >
> > I have options DEVICE_POLLING and options HZ=200, i have tested
> > with greater HZ values like 1000, and without DEVICE_POLLING  but i
> > have the same storm.
> 
> Try this:
> 
> http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200503161154.04555.jkim

as this points to my posts...

my problem is not the interrupt storm, but that I dont have assigned irq for
keyboard (which makes it slow I think).

and this is clear regression because in 5.3R it worked ;(

where should I look (in sources) what changed? I am not very skilled with this
lowlevel stuff but I am able and willing to try to hunt this down.

thnx for reply

roman
Received on Wed Mar 30 2005 - 14:22:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:30 UTC