Re: strcspn(3) complexity improvement

From: Peter Jeremy <PeterJeremy_at_optushome.com.au>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 21:25:49 +1000
On Wed, 2005-Mar-30 10:31:45 -0800, Brooks Davis wrote:
>The real question I have is, how long does the string need to be before
>this is a win and how much does it hurt for typical string lengths?
>I've written code with strcspn that needed to perform well, but it was
>parsing 80-column punch card derived formats.

I was thinking about this last night.  The easy way is to generate random
"string" and "charset" arrays of varying length and time both strcspn()
variants - this gives you two two-dimensional surfaces showing timing
vs argument size.  The difficulty is visualising the result and
deciding whether pairs of random strings are realistic.

-- 
Peter Jeremy
Received on Thu Mar 31 2005 - 09:26:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:31 UTC