On 05/01/05 10:18, Ihsan Dogan wrote: > On Friday, 29 Apr 2005 09:35 -0500, Craig Boston wrote: >>>This is a problem that has been brought up on gnome_at_, ports_at_ and >>>current_at_ from time to time. There are many, many sites, all heavily >>>flash based, that exhibit this problem with any native browser to use >>>the linux flash6 plugin. As the flash code is the linux binary, it is >>>not likely to be there. (These sites don't hang on linux systems.) >> >>FWIW, I use linux-mozilla-1.7.5 and linux-flashplugin-7.0r25_1 to access >>flash based sites with no problem. The flash6/7 problems seem to be >>related to using the pluginwrapper to get it to work with native >>browsers. > > Can linux-mozilla and mozilla co-exist on the same machine? Yes they can. They install to separate places and use different directories for configuration information. By the way: If you are using ports than you will be told when a port cannot be installed because it conflicts with another. To find this out manually, check for a CONFLICTS entry in the port Makefile. -- Jonathan Noack | noackjr_at_alumni.rice.edu | OpenPGP: 0x991D8195
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:33 UTC