Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2005-05-10 10:41, Andre Guibert de Bruet <andy_at_siliconlandmark.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 10 May 2005, Skip Ford wrote: > > > PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU CPU > > > COMM > > >AND > > >1352 skip 1 96 0 18968K 16276K select 0:21 0.00% 0.00% > > >Xor > > > 691 skip 1 8 0 4784K 3940K wait 0:08 0.00% 0.00% > > > mut > > > 684 skip 1 96 0 2336K 1948K select 0:07 0.00% 0.00% > > > scr > > > 667 root 1 4 0 24268K 23196K accept 0:06 0.00% 0.00% > > > per > > > 580 root 1 20 0 22896K 21948K pause 0:04 0.00% 0.00% > > > per > > > 447 root 1 96 0 2864K 1724K select 0:02 0.00% 0.00% > > > ntp > > > > What is the length of the longest username that you have on your system? > > Ah, yes! Good thought. This could affect the width of the USERNAME > column and push everything too far to the right. If this is the case, > I'd probably vote for optionally limiting the length of the username > column to, say, 8 columns at most. FWIW, I'd vote for 6. I'd much rather see more of the command. -- SkipReceived on Tue May 10 2005 - 13:49:04 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:34 UTC