On 5/11/2005 13:13, Rob wrote: >--- Subhro <subhro.kar_at_gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>On 5/11/2005 8:04, Rob wrote: >> >> >> >>>All computers are running 5-Stable, as of May 10. >>>All, but PC1 with fxp, use polling, with: >>> options DEVICE_POLLING >>> options HZ=1000 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>1000 IMHO seems a bit too heavy. Try something >>lower. >> >> > >Same problem. Ssh-tunnel connection is also disrupted >with HZ=100. May I conclude that the HZ value is not >the culprit? Or should I try once again with HZ=10? > > 100 should be fine. 10 would be a bit too much overkill. >kern.ipc.nmbclusters is 4928 for this PC. >Is that good or bad? > > What is the purpose of the box? Give a description of the network traffic. >"sysctl -a | grep -i polling" gives following: >kern.polling.burst: 150 >kern.polling.each_burst: 5 >kern.polling.burst_max: 150 >kern.polling.idle_poll: 0 >kern.polling.poll_in_trap: 0 >kern.polling.user_frac: 50 >kern.polling.reg_frac: 20 >kern.polling.short_ticks: 0 >kern.polling.lost_polls: 6 >kern.polling.pending_polls: 0 >kern.polling.residual_burst: 0 >kern.polling.handlers: 0 >kern.polling.enable: 0 >kern.polling.phase: 0 >kern.polling.suspect: 6 >kern.polling.stalled: 0 >kern.polling.idlepoll_sleeping: 1 ><118>kern.polling.enable: ><118>xl0: flags=18843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX, > MULTICAST,POLLING> mtu 1500 ><118> options=49<RXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,POLLING> ><118>xl1: flags=18843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX, > MULTICAST,POLLING> mtu 1500 ><118> options=49<RXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,POLLING> > > > Did you use any strange CFLAGS like -O3 or -f* compile time options when you built the system? Regards S.Received on Wed May 11 2005 - 05:47:08 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:34 UTC