Re: why omshell when no dhcpd ?

From: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc_at_crodrigues.org>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 11:03:11 -0400

On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 03:26:27PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> 
> Why do we have the omshell program in the base system when dhcpd is not
> there ?

Probably no good reason, other than being an artifact of having
isc-dhcp in the base system.

-- 
Craig Rodrigues        
rodrigc_at_crodrigues.org

Received on Thu May 19 2005 - 13:03:19 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Scot Hetzel: "Re: CURRENT: ifconfig tap0 results in core dump"
Previous message: FreeBSD Tinderbox: "[current tinderbox] failure on i386/i386"
In reply to: Poul-Henning Kamp: "why omshell when no dhcpd ?"
Next in thread: Brooks Davis: "Re: why omshell when no dhcpd ?"
Reply: Brooks Davis: "Re: why omshell when no dhcpd ?"
Reply: Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH: "Re: why omshell when no dhcpd ?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:34 UTC