Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote: > > On Thu, 26 May 2005, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: > >> Agreed, but as you say, FreeBSD is not there yet, and since the OP is >> on FreeBSD, and wants to have multiple computers attached, NFS would >> be one way of making that happen. And if you leave the other >> computers attached by the FC but not mounted, if on goes down, you can >> replace it with another, and switch your nfs server over. Not as >> ideal but doable on FreeBSD. > > > This hack would not be suitable in an HA environment -- It requires > human intervention or some really fugly scripts not just for the NFS > server, but also for the clients. These scripts would have to figure out > how to recover NFS file locking state and consistency when the backup > machine fails over. > > It seems as if NFS in this type of setup introduces more problems than > it solves. > > Andy > So what we need is some manpower. I estimate that a proof-of-concept port of GFS would take about 4-6 solid months. There is also a volume management aspect to GFS, but that is less important and the existing GEOM classes can largely fill the role already. Anyone interested in taking a serious look at it? ScottReceived on Fri May 27 2005 - 02:12:23 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:35 UTC