My SATA HDD with UFS2 crashed. While checking HDD fsck said, that alternate super block at block 32 is not present. In 'man fsck' I saw, that in UFS2 (my file system) alternate super block is usually located in block 160 (For UFS1 - in 32). So the question is: why fsck trying to find alternate superblock in wrong block for UFS2? I can suppose, that fsck dont know file system type (UFS1 or UFS2) while checking, but such assumption seems to be wrong.Received on Thu Nov 03 2005 - 10:31:38 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:47 UTC