Re: Using ccache for build{world, kernel}

From: michael johnson <buhnux_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 19:48:00 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On Nov 15, 2005, at 7:41 PM, Nicolas Blais wrote:

> On November 15, 2005 07:30 pm, michael johnson wrote:
>
>> On Nov 15, 2005, at 7:06 PM, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
>>
>>> I have better patch which extends detection mechanism, so that
>>> along with size/mtime checksum of the compiler binary is stored as
>>> well. Since compiler binary linked from the same sources/objects
>>> will have the same checksum it allows ccache to be used OOB with
>>> buildworld. Do you have any interest in putting it into the port?
>>>
>>> http://www.portaone.com/~sobomax/ccache.buildworld
>>>
>>
>> Sure, I just have one question about the way this thing works. Would
>> using this patch not
>> make collision probability of the cache higher? I don't think this
>> would be a huge problem,
>> but it's not impossible to do with a 1,000,000~ file cache now.
>>
>>
>
> Whatever the final outcome, the current port of ccache breaks a lot  
> of big
> compiles (3 ports failed during 'portupgrade -ai', such as GTK2.8.7  
> and
> buildworld) while NOCCACHE makes the build a success.

Can you give me the error?

I'm not seeing this

>
> Maybe flag the port 'broken' until it is safe to use?
>
> Nicolas.
>
> -- 
> FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #0: Tue Nov 15 06:21:56 EST 2005
> root_at_clk01a:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CLK01A
> PGP? : http://www.clkroot.net/security/nb_root.asc
>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFDeoHDn4uqfTwEb9YRAvRdAJ4j1nnP1QfFR/aySmrHTnGrhVrw7gCfXDSg
Zpfdf0tpHj+0I6KQPalLHMY=
=zj1d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tue Nov 15 2005 - 23:48:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:47 UTC