Kris Kennaway wrote: >On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 07:52:30AM +0800, David Xu wrote: > > >>Kris Kennaway wrote: >> >> >> >>>Perhaps this can be tweaked. >>> >>>Kris >>> >>>P.S. Please, no responses about how maybe someone could write a new >>>scheduler that doesn't have this property. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>Can you try it again with FULL_PREEMPTION is turned on ? >> >> > >Didn't really make a difference: > > > This might only can be fixed when msleep no longer explicitly fiddles thread priority, let scheduler fully control it.Received on Wed Nov 23 2005 - 23:34:46 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:48 UTC