Re: What is the correct behaviour for local socket(AF_UNIX) in the following scenario?

From: Joseph Koshy <joseph.koshy_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 23:37:55 +0530

> Now if there is no process p2 to read the data written by
> process p1 from the same localsocket, then this has resulted
> in a huge memory leak on a FreeBSD system.

How are you measuring the 'leak', and which version of FreeBSD
are you using?

--
FreeBSD Volunteer,     http://people.freebsd.org/~jkoshy

Received on Thu Nov 24 2005 - 17:07:59 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Mayank Kumar: "What is the correct behaviour for local socket(AF_UNIX) in the following scenario?"
Previous message: Mayank Kumar: "What is the correct behaviour for local socket(AF_UNIX) in the following scenario?"
In reply to: Mayank Kumar: "What is the correct behaviour for local socket(AF_UNIX) in the following scenario?"
Next in thread: Robert Watson: "Re: What is the correct behaviour for local socket(AF_UNIX) in the following scenario?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:48 UTC