On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 10:53:58AM +0200, Divacky Roman wrote: > Hi, > > scottl_at_ removed: > <td>Nullfs (and perhaps other filesystems) use an absurdly small > hash size that causes significant performance penalties.</td> > > this item from 6.0R todo list. How was this solved? I didnt see any commits > to enlarge the hash values. Its still the same... why it was removed then? It was an incorrect suggestion on my part - it turns out this was not the cause of the performance penalties, and Jeff fixed them long ago. Kris
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:44 UTC