Re: 6.0R todo list - hash sizes

From: Kris Kennaway <kris_at_obsecurity.org>
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 11:46:28 -0400
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 10:53:58AM +0200, Divacky Roman wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> scottl_at_ removed:
>     <td>Nullfs (and perhaps other filesystems) use an absurdly small
>      hash size that causes significant performance penalties.</td>
> 
> this item from 6.0R todo list. How was this solved? I didnt see any commits
> to enlarge the hash values. Its still the same... why it was removed then?

It was an incorrect suggestion on my part - it turns out this was not
the cause of the performance penalties, and Jeff fixed them long ago.

Kris


Received on Sat Oct 01 2005 - 13:46:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:44 UTC