Re: wpa_supplicant and WEP....

On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, Eric Schuele wrote:
> Tai-hwa Liang wrote:
>> On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, Eric Schuele wrote:
>> 
>>> Hello,
>>> 
>
> <snip>
>
>>> 
>>> Kernel Config: (are wlan_* necessary?)
>> 
>> 
>>   If you are using WEP only, wlan + wlan_wep should be enough.
>
> Ok... well its a long story, so I'll spare you. But, I had never known they 
> even existed till I stumbled across someone elses post saying they were 
> necessary.  Thanks for confirming they are needed.
>
> I got the rest of my problems fixed by another post.
>
> Thanks for the response.
>
> (p.s.  for some reason I could not CC you!?!)

   Hmm, your mail server doesn't seem to like me. :)

The original message was received at Fri, 30 Sep 2005 23:03:57 -0400
from gemini4.ieee.org [140.98.193.189]

    ----- Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to gateway-r.comcast.net.:
>>> DATA
<<< 450 [TEMPFAIL] comcast.net requires valid sender domain
e.schuele_at_comcast.net... Deferred: 450 [TEMPFAIL] comcast.net requires valid
sender domain
<<< 503 need RCPT command [data]
... while talking to gateway-s.comcast.net.:
>>> DATA
<<< 450 [TEMPFAIL] comcast.net requires valid sender domain
e.schuele_at_comcast.net... Deferred: 450 [TEMPFAIL] comcast.net requires valid
sender domain
<<< 503 need RCPT command [data]
Warning: message still undelivered after 4 hours
Will keep trying until message is 1 day old