Hi Kris, Thanks for the response. Are you aware of any bugs in nullfs on FreeBSD 4? I'm still using 4.10/4.11 on a lot of servers. Although, as I mentioned, I've been using nullfs pretty heavily for a ProFTPD chroot for over 2 years now. I just don't want to suddenly get the bum's rush :) -Jim Keller Kris Kennaway wrote: >On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 11:58:15PM -0400, Jim Keller wrote: > > >>I've been using mount_null for quite some time to mount filesystems >>beneath chroot jails, and have had no problems. However, the man page >>for mount_null has had a warning (since 1995, apparently) that "IT >>DOESN'T WORK", and I know OpenBSD has removed nullfs support as of >>version 3.7 (per >>http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/2005-09/0198.html). The >>bug listed in that thread doesn't appear to apply to FreeBSD, as I was >>able to successfully null mount /dev and list its contents. So my >>questions are: >> >>1. is nullfs actively supported on FreeBSD? If so, are there plans to >>continue supporting it? >> >> > >Yes and yes. In fact I don't know of any remaining nullfs bugs on >FreeBSD 5 and above (although I only stress it on 6 and above), so the >warning should just be removed. > >Kris > > Kris Kennaway wrote: >On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 11:58:15PM -0400, Jim Keller wrote: > > >>I've been using mount_null for quite some time to mount filesystems >>beneath chroot jails, and have had no problems. However, the man page >>for mount_null has had a warning (since 1995, apparently) that "IT >>DOESN'T WORK", and I know OpenBSD has removed nullfs support as of >>version 3.7 (per >>http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/2005-09/0198.html). The >>bug listed in that thread doesn't appear to apply to FreeBSD, as I was >>able to successfully null mount /dev and list its contents. So my >>questions are: >> >>1. is nullfs actively supported on FreeBSD? If so, are there plans to >>continue supporting it? >> >> > >Yes and yes. In fact I don't know of any remaining nullfs bugs on >FreeBSD 5 and above (although I only stress it on 6 and above), so the >warning should just be removed. > >Kris > >Received on Sun Oct 02 2005 - 05:50:07 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:44 UTC