M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <4341A55B.1070209_at_shapeshifter.se> > Fredrik Lindberg <fli+freebsd-current_at_shapeshifter.se> writes: > : Filtering on subvendor/subdevice might be better, I didn't even think > : of that and revision filtering seemed to be quite popular among > : exsisting drivers. > > Yes. Many chip vendors bump the revision field 'often'. Just how > often varies from chip maker to chip maker. Some do only when they > have a new version of the chip that needs special work arounds (or > that no longer needs them :-). Others do change it for each change to > the silicon. Most are somewhere inbetween. > > : The subdevice id for a rev.3 card seems to be 0x0024 (subvendor 0x1737). > : I don't own a rev. 2 card but google says that the rev.2 card has > : subdevice id 0x0015 (subvendor 0x1737). > > That might be sufficient... > Ok, how should this be implemented then? Just a specific check in each drivers probe methods or by adding some svid/sdid fields to struct rl_type and similar structs. I would go for the latter, but that might be overkill. FredrikReceived on Tue Oct 04 2005 - 07:49:38 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:44 UTC