On Tue, October 11, 2005 1:39 pm, Joshua Coombs wrote: > > "Scott Long" <scottl_at_samsco.org> wrote in message > news:434BEC96.4050801_at_samsco.org... > >> Joshua Coombs wrote: >> >> >>> Given that we're in the RC stage, is it too late to get a PR >>> stuffed in to correct ntpd/ntpdate behavior in /etc/rc.d? >>> >>> Joshua Coombs >>> >>> >> >> Depends on the kind of problem that you are seeing. Any details? >> >> >> Scott >> > > Two issues I spotted. > > > First, ntpdate is still being used, despite it being marked as > depreciated for quite some time. The preferred replacement is to call ntpd > with the -q switch. This causes ntpd to match ntpdate's behavior, it sets I like my ntpdate command, and im not about to change all my scripts and configure some ntpd servers just to quickly sync the time.Received on Wed Oct 12 2005 - 00:07:52 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:45 UTC