Re: Regression in device ath between BETA5 and RC1?

On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 22:03:46 -0600 (MDT) M. Warner Losh wrote:

> In message: <20051020232308.GA77950_at_xor.obsecurity.org>
>             Kris Kennaway <kris_at_obsecurity.org> writes:
> : On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 05:46:52PM -0500, Doug Poland wrote:
> : > Kris Kennaway wrote:
> : > >On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 05:11:41PM -0500, Doug Poland wrote:
> : > >
> : > >
> : > >>I was seeing this behavior a lot on 5.2.1, 5.3, and, IIRC, 5.4.
> : > >>Responsiveness was so poor as to make remote SSH sessions unusable.
> : > >>When I installed -CURRENT then RELENG_6, then the NIC started performing
> : > >>beautifully.  Very stable and consistent.  Now, with yesterday's cvsup'd
> : > >>to RC1, the NIC/driver is performing poorly again.
> : > >
> : > >
> : > >Go back to the previous version to verify it's not environmental or
> : > >some other problem than a regression in FreeBSD.
> : > >
> : > Sure, can you tell me what tag to use in my supfile?  Right now I have:
> : > 
> : >   *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6
> : 
> : Use a date instead of a tag (see the cvsup docs).

> *default release=cvs date=2005.10.10.12.23.45

> and try to find where, since June, the divergence of performance was.
> We branched RELENG_6 in June, and there's been much merged from head
> back into RELENG_6.

>From the first letter of this thread: "Today I cvsup'd from BETA5 to
RC1 and have noticed..." When did BETA-5 appeared? This can narrow
down the search.


WBR
-- 
bsam