On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 11:31:44PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 01:43:37PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > K> > I have a problem with multi-port card based on Nm9845 chip. > K> > It's a card with 4 com-ports. > K> > It perfectly works with puc(4) and sio(4) drivers if they compiled into > K> > kernel. > K> > or with puc(4) and uart(4) drivers if they loaded manualy. > K> > But if puc(4) and uart(4) are compiled into kernel or loaded from > K> > loader.conf - problem appears. > K> > K> Isn't puc superceded by uart? Why do you need both? > > Shouldn't uarts attach on puc? This is what I have in 5.4-STABLE > system: > > puc0: <Cronyx Omega2-PCI> mem 0xea202000-0xea202fff irq 5 at device 11.0 on pci0 > uart0: <16750 or compatible> on puc0 > uart1: <16750 or compatible> on puc0 > uart2: <16750 or compatible> on puc0 > uart3: <16750 or compatible> on puc0 > uart4: <16750 or compatible> on puc0 > uart5: <16750 or compatible> on puc0 > uart6: <16750 or compatible> on puc0 > uart7: <16750 or compatible> on puc0 > > Should it be other way in 6.0 and HEAD? Sorry, I was confused..you do need both. I was thinking about uart superceding other sparc tty drivers. Kris
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:46 UTC